that had been shaped by those places. But already Tolkien was being pulled in opposite directions, towards nostalgic, rustic beauty and also towards unknown, untamed sublimity. Curiously, the activities of the other dreaming children at the Cottage of Lost Play hint at Tolkienâs world-buildingurges, for while some dance and sing and play, others lay âplans / To build them houses, fairy towns, / Or dwellings in the treesâ.
A debt is surely owed to Peter Panâs Neverland. Tolkien had seen J. M. Barrieâs masterpiece at the theatre as an eighteen-year-old in 1910, writing afterwards: â Indescribable but shall never forget it as long as I live.â This was a play aimed squarely at an orphanâs heart, featuring a cast of children severed from their mothers by distance or death. A chiaroscuro by turns sentimental and cynical, playful and deadly serious, Peter Pan took a rapier to mortality itself â its hero a boy who refuses to grow up and who declares that âTo die will be an awfully big adventure.â
But Tolkienâs idyll, for all its carefree joy, is lost in the past. Time has reasserted itself, to the grief and bewilderment of the dreamers.
And why it was Tomorrow came,
And with his grey hand led us back;
And why we never found the same
Old cottage, or the magic track
That leads between a silver sea
And those old shores and gardens fair
Where all things are, that ever were â
We know not, You and Me.
The companion piece Tolkien wrote at the same time, â Goblin Feet â, finds us on a similar magic track surrounded by a twilight hum of bats and beetles and sighing leaves. A procession of fairy-folk approaches and the poem slips into an ecstatic sequence of exclamations.
O! the lights: O! the gleams: O! the little tinkly sounds:
O! the rustle of their noiseless little robes:
O! the echo of their feet â of their little happy feet:
O! their swinging lamps in little starlit globes.
Yet âGoblin Feetâ turns in an instant from rising joy to loss and sadness, capturing once again a very Tolkienian yearning. Themortal onlooker wants to pursue the happy band, or rather he feels compelled to do so; but no sooner is the thought formed than the troop disappears around a bend.
I must follow in their train
Down the crooked fairy lane
Where the coney-rabbits long ago have gone,
And where silverly they sing
In a moving moonlit ring
All a-twinkle with the jewels they have on.
They are fading round the turn
Where the glow-worms palely burn
And the echo of their padding feet is dying!
O! itâs knocking at my heart â
Let me go! O! let me start!
For the little magic hours are all a-flying.
O! the warmth! O! the hum! O! the colours in the dark!
O! the gauzy wings of golden honey-flies!
O! the music of their feet â of their dancing goblin feet!
O! the magic! O! the sorrow when it dies.
Enchantment, as we know from fairy-tale tradition, tends to slip away from envious eyes and possessive fingers â though there is no moral judgement implied in âGoblin Feetâ. Faërie and the mortal yearning it evokes seem two sides of a single coin, a fact of life.
In a third, slighter, piece that followed on 29 and 30 April, Tolkien pushed the idea of faëry exclusiveness further. â Tinfang Warble â is a short carol, barely more than a sound-experiment, perhaps written to be set to music, with its echo (âO the hoot! O the hoot!â) of the exclamatory chorus of âGoblin Feetâ. In part, the figure of Tinfang Warble is descended in literary tradition from Pan, the piper-god of nature; in part, he comes from a long line of shepherds in pastoral verse, except he has no flock. Now the faëry performance lacks even the communal impulse of the earlier poemâs marching band. It is either puton for the benefit of a single glimmering star, or it is entirely solipsistic.
Dancing all alone,
Hopping on a