rattling down the conduits. Iâve always seen the mind as neatly compartmentalised, a bunch of different-coloured rooms jammed together. Green for my dreams, red for the work-room, lemon for love. And my ideas-room? Kaleidoscopic, I suppose, all shape and blur and moments of extraordinary brightness.
Which sounds nice, very comforting. Trouble is, at the moment, the ideas-room is cold and grey-white â the noncolour of negatives â and I feel like I should follow my mother-in-lawâs tart advice to âgo get a real jobâ. Emphasise real .
Nevertheless, today is broad and bright and the air sears my lungs. Maybe I will ring Stu later and say to him, âWeâre on, O Agent Fair Foul. Weâre back! Weâre live! Weâre happening, baby!â
I can imagine the conversation. Stu, poor unfortunate Stu, has this habit of introducing LA trash-talk into his business dealings. People become âcommoditiesâ (âAnd you are a commode,â I told him once, angry about some rather pertinent criticism of my work. âIâd like to shit in you.â) Books transform into âunitsâ and the idea that has left me sleep-deprived and emotionally rabid for months is a âproductâ. People who read books are âthe market-faceâ. And â I swear this is true â for a while he did develop the grating habit of calling everyone âbabyâ. It coincided with his Bret Easton Ellis phase. He wangled an invite to a publishing junket in NY and met BEE at a CP where the cocktails were gratis and the chicks all had BTs and QT asses.
âArses, Stu â not asses. In Australia, we cleverly broaden the pronunciation to reflect the shape of the noun.â
He wasnât listening.
âBret E.E. was a great guy, babyâ he told me, arching his eyebrows impressively. âVery feet-on-the-ground. Definitely in-for-the-long-haul. Not at all what I expected.â
âStu,â I said, âis that mascara on your eyebrows?â
He looked momentarily hurt.
âUm ⦠no. Actually itâs kohl. Look, everybodyâs doing it. Itâs the major vibe in the States.â
I shrank in disgust. Everybodyâs doing it â the ultimate cop-out justification. Stu would try ovine necrophilia if he thought that everybody was doing it.
If I write something today, if I ring Stu and tell him that the dam is broken, the Muse smiling and the words flowing like shit from a Bondi drain-pipe, heâll say, âWhat sort of product are we talking here? How many units do we envisage? Howâs the market-face going to react?â Whereas I want someone whoâll say, âCool bananas, Vincey boy. You write anything you like, anything at all â and Iâll get it published for you. Thatâs my faith in you, man, thatâs my promise to your talent.â
All of which begs the question: Why do I keep Stu?
Heâs cheap, thatâs why. A meagre ten per cent of any royalties and free representation until we crack another contract. Canât ask for cheaper than that â and I canât get near a publisher without an agent. Especially when the only book Iâve ever published is called Pears Amid Paradisio: An Allegory By Vincent Daley and no one I know has read it, and people I donât know who have read it havenât liked it, and the one critical review it received, courtesy of the Coastal Daily, denounced it as unintentionally hilarious and pretentiously stylised (thank you J.S.Cooper of âWeekly Book Reviewâ fame).
Which begs another, more fundamental question: Why be a writer? Why not something simpler, like President of an African nation, or something more profitable, like insider trading? Well, truth be known, in former lives I was, albeit briefly:
i)Â Â a public servant
ii)Â Â a shoe salesman
iii) and a teacher.
Or, as I like to think of them:
i)Â Â alone and bored shitless amidst