evidence collection, she was the most logical witness to start with. And of course the strongest.
âPlease tell the jury what you found in the garage.â
âI noticed a large suitcase, navy blue and yellow in color, which was under the tool bench,â D orian answered.
âWhat drew your attention to that suitcase?â I asked.
âA corner of it stuck out from under the bench.â
âAs though someone had shoved it underneath in a hurry?â
Dorian shot me a warning look. âThe way it was situated would have put it in the way of anyone moving around the garage. So it seemed logical to conclude that it wasnât intentionally placed in that position.â
I declared victory with that answer and moved on.
âDid you notice anything that indicated a more likely place where the suitcase was normally stored?â I asked.
âYes. I noticed other suitcases of similar appearance, blue and yellow, on a shelf above the tool bench.â
I paused to let the informationâand hopefully the implicationsâsink in with the jury. It was one of those âsleeperâ p ieces of evidence, the significance of which can take a moment to appreciate. The fact that the suitcase had been dragged down off that shelf indicated that Melissa had been trying to get away. And the fact that the suitcase was still there in the garage, out of place, indicated not only that she hadnât made it but that there had possibly been some kind of struggle. So this single piece of evidence helped paint an entire scenario for the last moments of Melissaâs life. After stalling for as long as I dared to give the jury time to catch on, I asked Dorian what else sheâd found noteworthy in the garage.
âI found a scarf, pale blue plaid in color, near the door to the kitchen. I noted it because it was on the ground next to the stairs and I thought it fair to assume it wasnât normally kept there.â
I glanced at the jury and saw that most were taking notesâa good signâand that a few were smiling at Dorian. A great sign, because it showed that they spotted and appreciated Dorianâs minimalist approach, which meant she was scoring big points for credibility.
âWas it immediately visible to you when you entered the garage?â
âNo. The scarf was in a dark corner next to the wall, partially hidden by the shelving unit that was bolted to the wall.â
Point being, Saul Hildega rde wouldnât have noticed that it had fallen there in the heat of the moment and so never knew to get rid of it.
âDid you process that scarf for hair, blood, or foreign fibers?â
âI did. I found traces of human blood that I submitted for DNA testing, and I found a mixture of hairs, which I compared to hairs from Melissaâs brush, and to her familyâs hair, and to the defendantâs hair.â
âAnd what did you find?â
âI found a number of hairs consistent with Melissaâs that appeared to have been forcibly removedââ
âBy that, you mean yanked out of her head?â
Dorian gave me a stern look. âBy that, I mean pulled out, as opposed to falling out naturally. And I found some forcibly removed hairs consistent with the hair of this defendant as well.â Dorian nodded in Saul Hildegardeâs direction.
She hadnât approved of my editorialized yanked , but she hadnât refuted it. Iâd taken the risk of getting smacked by Dorian into account and decided it was worth it. Yanked painted a clearer picture of a violent struggle.
âDid you find any other evidence of note in the garage?â
âYes. I found what appeared to be damp spots on the floor, which I tested for the presence of blood.â
âAnd what was the result of that test?â
âIt was positive. But I must add that certain other substances may also give a positive result to that test, such as rust and certain vegetable