man depended. Hence the role of the Love-Masters whose field of investigation was the whole psycho-physical situation. âIt is after all not so far from the psycho-somatic approach of modern medicine â only that contains no built-in cosmic doctrine designed to pull out the thorns of the ego.â
Talking, arguing and eating thus in little bits we tackled the text piecemeal â there was so much to explain to me about the language of the original and the attitude of its ancient therapists. Behind the whole science lay a theory of fulcrum and realization which made the Buddhist adventure â even the Indian â one of the most extraordinary intellectual forays into the unknown. In the world of living things devoted to preying upon one another â and full of the savage defence mechanisms engendered by fear â the Buddhist proposed to make himself ever more defenceless against fate, thus unlocking the karmic spring, âthe will power of desirelessnessâ in E. Graham Howeâs phrase, which in fact modified his field of action by submission. To move thus towards the moon of his non-being, rolling with the punch, so to speak, he found an inner mechanism which ensured that he came back into his fair course at last by the law of the opposites. But all this to us was apparently going against the laws of evolution and causality as they seemed to be constituted in the theories of the survival of the fittest. Was the law of the jungle now what we had been led to believe? It was as if the yogi wished to re-establish an anterior state of mind, a plant-like acquiescence which perhaps had dominated early man â before the Aristotelian gift of consciousness bugged him, bogged him down with its cogito-ergo-impulse-inhibition-machine. I wondered if that was what Old Empedocles of Sicily had meant by saying that the first men were trees â perhaps he meant plants? After all, man came out of the water originally. The jewel of intuition realized from the lotus anchored in the mud of the primal consciousness?
Snap! the lights came on again and simultaneously Chang brought his great heap of whistling vegetables to table and we fell to, while he told me how strange he had found the New World at first, how difficult the language â not grammatically but conceptually. And how funny! Ah! the blessed irony of the Chinese mind! I realized then that it was quite different from that of the bandylegged and banausic Japs on one side, and the twanging tingling Indian sophists on the other. The man who can see the world with wondering irony tends to be a good conductor, someone on whom one can count! âTell me about Christianity,â he said, with his mouth full. âWell, to. begin with the Last Supper â it was not a vegetarian meal, you will have noticed.â I uncorked a wholesome bottle of St Saturnin and loaded my glass. Chang shook his head and said, âYou are drinking a little too much. We must try something on you.â I did not know what he meant, and I hoped it would be Chinese hypnotism which would influence my subliminal self to start cutting down. But all these ideas had excited me immeasurably and I needed the wine to carry out the architectural design of this simple but delicious meal, combining China, France and India in almost equal parts. âTell me about your education,â I said, and he laughed. He had heard the voice of the schools in full bombination. He had heard dons in California âexplicatingâ Shakespeare; he had seen chain-smoking American yogis reverently watching television in the Lotus pose ⦠He was funny about it and quite unmalicious. And now from his little air-bag he produced, somewhat to my surprise, a formidable collection of tubes of various vitamins with which he proceeded to dose himself. âWell, who would have thought it?â I said in a shocked tone, and he grinned. He said, âThere are many good things here in the West,