though of course that kind of startling early talent can disappear as quickly as it came. We were never to know. The boy was drowned at Dunkirk.
The score rattled up, Tommy was brought back on, but the ball had lost its shine and barely swung. He was no threat, and suffered. In apparent desperation the captain, a boy called Thayer, put himself on to bowl at the other end. He was mainly an opening bat, but could at need bowl slow leg tweakers, spinning them a mile but without much control of length and line. Dirty Dan hummed with excitementâThayer was in his house. The first two balls spun all right but were such long-hops that I felt I could have hooked them for six myself. The batsman did so with disdain.
âGround bait,â muttered Dirty Dan.
Another master, I forget who, chuckled derisively from the chair beyond.
The third ball was no improvement but spun far enough across the wicket for the batsman to decide to pull rather than hook it. His stroke was beautifully timed, and hit by a powerful young man from the meat of the bat.
Gerry Grantworth was fielding at short leg. This was in the days before helmets, and it was lunacy to have left him there against such a hitter with such erratic bowling. I have no idea how fast the ball was travelling. I saw Gerry leap, his hands full stretch above his head. His upper body whipped back so that for an instant I, and others to judge by the gasp, thought the ball must have caught him in the face. Then he had landed and was tossing the ball back to Thayer as unconcernedly as if heâd picked it up in a net. I was on my feet and yelling, and so was the master beyond Dirty Dan and most of the other spectators.
âThatâs the most extraordinary catch Iâve ever seen,â said the other master as he settled into his chair. âYou know, I believe that boy is capable of anything.â
Dirty Dan was relighting his pipe (he expended far more matches than tobacco) so his answer came late enough to seem isolated from what had prompted it, and thus vaguely oracular.
âIncluding, ultimately, his own destruction,â he said.
The other master grunted questioningly. Further pipe-suckings repeated the pause.
âHe believes himself invulnerable,â said Dirty Dan.
âAll adolescents do,â said the other master. âWhatâs more he broke his thumb in last yearâs Winchester match.â
(We all remembered this event, because Gerry had retired hurt, but returned at eighth wicket down to bat one-handed, scoring thirty-odd and achieving a draw.)
âMorally invulnerable,â said Dirty Dan. âAutomaton in armour, eh?â
I heard another grumble of incomprehension from the master. Dirty Dan sighed.
âAdolescent invulnerability, I grant you,â he said. âThis oneâs different. Cap-Ã -pie on the outside, no moral innards. Whatâs he for, eh? Merely to be Master Grantworth. His own purpose, thatâs all. All bets are certs, because heâs risking nothing, his side. Only they ainât. As heâll find out. But a sly bit of bowling from young Thayer, eh?â
As I say, we considered Dirty Dan a figure of fun, and I didnât take his comments seriously. I donât believe Iâve thought about them again until I came to write these words, and even now I am not sure what weight to give them.
I think thatâs all about Eton, except that I remember having the Vereker girls pointed out to me at Lordâs in my last year. They were all five there. Nancy was already in the gossip-columns and Harriet occasionally mentioned. The story as told at Etonâas reliable as any other gossip among adolescentsâwas that old Vereker had explained when he proposed that the object was to produce a male heir to Blatchards, and that the future Lady Vereker, a lawyerâs daughter, had replied that she would bear five children and no more, and that that done he should keep her in hunters for as