of discourse in which
you existed, and puttered about, was in all ways adequate and satisfactory. It may
never have crossed your mind to think that other universes of discoursedistinct from your own existed, with people in them, discoursing. You may have, in
a commonsense way, regarded your own u. of d. as a plenum, filled to the brim with
discourse. You may have felt that what already existed was a sufficiency. People like
you often do. That is certainly one way of regarding it, if fat self-satisfied complacency
is your aim. But I say unto you, Mr. Quistgaard, that even a plenum can leak. Even
a plenum, cher maître , can be penetrated. New things can rush into your plenum displacing old things, things
that were formerly there. No man’s plenum, Mr. Quistgaard, is impervious to the awl
of God’s will. Consider then your situation now . You are sitting there in your house on Neat Street, with your fine dog, doubtless,
and your handsome wife and tall brown sons, conceivably, and who knows with your gun-colored
Plymouth Fury in the driveway, and opinions passing back and forth, about whether
the Grange should build a new meeting hall or not, whether the children should become
Thomists or not, whether the pump needs more cup grease or not. A comfortable American
scene. But I, Jane Villiers de l’Isle-Adam, am in possession of your telephone number, Mr.
Quistgaard . Think what that means. It means that at any moment I can pierce your plenum with
a single telephone call, simply by dialing 989-7777. You are correct, Mr. Quistgaard,in seeing this as a threatening situation. The moment I inject discourse from my u.
of d. into your u. of d., the yourness of yours is diluted. The more I inject, the
more you dilute. Soon you will be presiding over an empty plenum, or rather, since
that is a contradiction in terms, over a former plenum, in terms of yourness. You
are, essentially, in my power. I suggest an unlisted number.
Yours faithfully,
J ANE
PAUL: A FRIEND OF THE FAMILY
“IS there someplace I can put this?” Paul asked indicating the large parcel he held
in his arms. “It is a new thing I just finished today, still a little wet I’m afraid.”
He wiped his hands which were covered with emulsions on his trousers. “I’ll just lean
it up against your wall for a moment.” Paul leaned the new thing up against our wall
for a moment. The new thing, a dirty great banality in white, poor-white and off-white,
leaned up against the wall. “Interesting,” we said. “It’s poor,” Snow White said.
“Poor, poor.” “Yes,” Paul said, “one of my poorer things I think.” “Not so poor of
course as yesterday’s, poorer on the other hand than some,” she said. “Yes,” Paul
said, “it has some of the qualities of poorness.” “Especially poor in the lower left-hand
corner,” she said. “Yes,” Paul said, “I would go so far as to hurl it into the marketplace.”
“They’re getting poorer,” she said. “Poorer and poorer,” Paul said with satisfaction,
“descending to unexplored depths of poorness where no human intelligence has ever
been.” “I find it extremely interesting as a social phenomenon,” Snow White said,
“to note that during the height of what is variously called, abstract expressionism,
action painting and so forth, when most artists were grouped together in a school,
you have persisted in an image alone. That, I find—and I think it has been described
as hard-edge painting,is an apt description, although it leaves out a lot, but I find it very interesting
that in the last few years there is a tremendous new surge of work being done in the
hard-edge image. I don’t know if you want to comment on that, but I find it extremely
interesting that you, who have always been sure of yourself and your image, were one
of the earliest, almost founders of that school, if you can even call it a school.”
“I have