whom eccentric. A French sociologist who cycled around wearing a Vietnamese nón lá (some say thatâs how heâd traveled to India from Paris), an Anglo-Indian professor of literature who couldnât ever remember whoâd written what, âShelleyâs Ode to a Nightingaleâ, and a visiting biologist from Germany who brewed his coffee in intricate laboratory apparatus. Nicholas, though, was more object of fervent curiosity.
Often, heâd visit the senior memberâs common room, mingling with the other professors, obtrusive for his youthâthe rest were mostly grey-haired gentlemen and a few prim salwar or sari-clad ladiesâandattire. Pale shirts of impossibly fine cotton, pressed and pristine, sharp-cut trousers, stylish loafers. Simple yet hard to imitate; everything I could afford in the market lookedâthereâs no other way to say thisâcheap. Sometimes, heâd lounge in the college café, drinking endless cups of tea, writing in a black notebook, picking at a serving of mince cutlets and buttered toast. Or heâd read, on the fringes of the lawn, under the generous canopy of peepal trees.
Iâd watch him, follow his movements, keep a lookout for when heâd visit the campus.
As, I suspect, did many of the other students.
It wasnât only because he was a white stranger.
There was something thrillingly mysterious about him.
Or so everyone liked to believe.
From here and there, I caught snatches of rumor.
That he was a new lecturer whoâd recently joined the faculty, that he was a visiting scholar from Cambridge. Someone else said he was here on fieldwork, conducting research at the National Museum.
Among the students, the girls in particular, he was of special interest; they sought him out and jostled for his attention. Some claimed to have befriended âNickâ, saying heâd paid keen attention to their theories on the earliest figurative representations of the Buddha.
Occasionally, in the corridors and lawns, I saw him with Adheer.
And strange as it may sound, I was stung by jealousy. That Adheer was marked out from the rest. That it wasnât me. Although then it seemed impossible, unthinkable even, that I could be similarly acquainted with the art historian.
I was in most ways unremarkable.
Iâd always felt so. Once, I read about Italo Svevo, a nineteenth-century Italian writer whose characters are often referred to as uomini senza qualità ⦠men without qualities⦠people whose qualities are ambiguous, dilute⦠perhaps in some ways even inept with the world.
And I thought that could be me.
When I looked in the mirror, I always wished I occupied more space, that my reflection was less inconsequential. In college I wasnât painfully thin, or scrawnyâI played football oftenâjust⦠slight. And Iâd examine my face, in the time it took for me to splash it at the sink, knowing they were there to stayâthe eyes, a shade slanted, that diminutive nose, a full stop rather than an exclamation mark. My mouth. Like squashed fruit.
Above all this, I had no reason to approach the art historian. Even if I did, I was certain Iâd be unable to muster up the courage. And why shouldnât it be Adheer? Marked out from the rest. From a royal family in Indore, Iâd heard. With his elegantly tailored kurtas, long and light, flowing like a breeze around him. Adheer was the most sophisticated of us all (though, at the time, we preferred âpretentiousâ). While we listened to Led Zeppelin and The Rolling Stones, rich and tragic ragas drifted out of his room. While we thumbed through Salinger and Camusâlike every generation before us we held Catcher in the Rye and The Outsider intimately and preciously our ownâhe claimed to have read all of Krishnamurti, all of Kabir.
âPerhaps,â Iâd offer, âthey didnât get along.â
Iâd be met by incredulity.