knocks over the conversation. The point is that our irrational heritage from the evolutionary jungle of rape and murderâânatureâs agriculture of deathââmust be opposed by rational intelligence if we are to survive and transcend ourselves. The style of Macrolife reflects its firm adherence to reason and to the power of rational persuasion.
It isnât the case that it would be vulgar to have the characters joking, swearing, and âslangingâ each other. Rather, the mood of the dialogue is the mood of the bookâs deepest beliefs, beliefs that are sincerely held rather than merely being adopted as a pretext to write a momentarily vivid but forgettable yarn.
Much trivia occurs in novels, a lot of it concerned with so-called character-building. Zebrowskiâs characters arenât flat; they are complex and imperfect, especially John Bulero in Part 2, no superhero but a study in failure who manages in the end to transcend his somewhat self-indulgent angst. Yet trivia as such are absent. Perhaps this reflects Zebrowskiâs relations as a child with his own parents. The Nazi war, and the sufferings of his parents and his people, âcast its shadow over everything,â he confesses, âpreventing my problems from just being my own. I had no right to have lesser problems.â Personal trivia were as nothing.
In Part 2, âMacrolife: 3000,â the cloned John Bulero is an old-style human being among a space-faring community of genetically enhanced specimens of humanity-plusâwho link with the presiding artificial intelligence and are now part way toward the larger mind-fusion to come. Johnâs compulsive, if shy, adventuring upon the dirt-world Lea, which becomes increasingly bound up with his own erotic mesmerism by the planet-born young woman Anulka, comes to grief finally through failure of forethought on his part followed by a failure of rationality. Being ruled by the old drivesâsuch as plain savage revenge and the habit of pulling the wool over oneâs eyesâJohn may seem in some respects a more ârealâ character than others who are genetically akin to him in the âSunspace: 2021â section. Yet he is, in fact, exactly as they were. It is only by comparison with the transhu-mans now surrounding him that he seems more familiar to us . This is actually an illusion, a product of our mesmerism by the old emotional drives and of our consequent expectations as to how ârealâ characters ought to behave, namely, to fly into rages, to sulk, to fight, to agonize, to act irrationally. Just as the personal must eventually be superseded and integrated, so âpersonalitiesâ should not be valued too grossly.
At the same time, Johnâs errorsâand the errors represented by the dirtworldâforcefully illustrate an important fact about evolution in any species, namely, that individuals and species alike must not aspire to a wholly perfect state where they can no longer make errors from which to learn.
Macrolife first appeared in 1979. Just over a decade earlier another believer in the transmutation of humanity, Alexei Panshin, won a
Nebula Award for his novel Rite of Passage , detailing the twenty-seven-thousand-strong society of another macroworld, an asteroid starship commuting around the dirtworlds that were seeded before nuclear cataclysm destroyed the Earth due to overpressure in the egg. Zebrowskiâs âfactualâ sources for Macrolife were such as J. D. Bernal and Dandridge Cole, but itâs illuminating to examine the fictional evolution of the idea between Rite of Passage and the later book.
Panshinâs society, like that of Zebrowskiâs original Asterome, is a two-tiered democracy with an executive council and the option of universal plebiscites. However, Panshinâs macroworlders are quite rigidly conservative and opposed to change, and a power ethic prevails. In Macrolife , when the UN