go.
âWhat should I say to them?â I asked.
âDonât worry,â he replied. âYouâll do fine.â
âBut I donât want the job,â I said.
âOf course you donât,â he replied.
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
I wouldnât fit in here,â I assured the first assistant managing editor I was taken to meet. He was a tall, unassumingly elegant man with a courtly manner. He had drooping gray hair and a surprisingly small and dreary office.
âWhy is that?â he asked.
âBecause,â I explained, âI donât review restaurants the way your critics do.â
âOh?â he said. âAnd how do our critics review restaurants?â
âThey hand down judgments from on high,â I said. âThey seem to think that they are right.â
âTheyâre wrong?â he asked.
âThere is no right or wrong in matters of taste,â I said. âItâs just an opinion. And in the case of restaurants, an extremely subjective one, given that no one has the faintest idea if what you taste when you bite into an apple is the same thing that I do.â
He looked a little taken aback, and I saw that he had expected me to lobby for the job. âYou may be right,â he said in a conciliatory tone that clearly indicated I was not. âBut of course,â he continued, âshould you come to the Times, you would do things our way.â
âNo,â I said, âI wouldnât. But why would you hire me if you donât want what I do?â
âI think itâs time for your next appointment,â he replied, ushering me to the door.
Next up was Al Siegal, the much-dreaded arbiter of linguistic style. He turned out to be a thoughtful man of considerable girth. âMr. Five by Fiveâ played in my head as he said, âYouâve been very successful at the Los Angeles Times. You run your own department. Why would you consider coming to New York at this point?â
I was surprised by my answer. Looking him straight in the eye, I said, âMy mother died a year ago. I wouldnât have considered living here while she was alive, but now that sheâs gone, I guess I can come home.â
He looked utterly shocked and a thrill ran through me. âThatâs done it!â I thought. âTheyâll never hire me now.â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
I saw one bigwig after another, surprised that none of them seemed to know what questions they should be asking. But it gave me the opportunity to ask a few of my own. âWho tells your critics what to review?â I queried one man.
His head jerked back as if I had just suggested that the paper was riddled with corruption. âI certainly hope,â he said stiffly, âthat the Los Angeles Times does not attempt to influence its critics.â
âNever,â I replied. âBut Iâve been told that things are different at the New York Times. They say that Bryan Miller doesnât choose his own restaurants and that the editors even decide how many stars a restaurant should receive.â
âI can assure you,â he said, looking extremely solemn, âthat there is no truth in that rumor. Our critics are given the widest possible latitude. It is unthinkable that anyone would ever, ever, interfere with a criticâs opinion. That would beââhe cast about, searching for a suitably derogatory wordââunethical.â And then, to make his point perfectly clear, âAbsolutely unethical. And not at all in the tradition of the Times. â
As they escorted me from one gray cubicle to the next, I thought how itchy this would be if I actually wanted the job. These men in suits had a pompous gravitas, a kind of sureness we lacked at the Los Angeles Times. We were eager to please; they dared you to please them.
The physical differences were also shocking. In Los Angeles we had big airy, open offices. Light