wouldnât take their money. But there was something in the photograph that just might help. She didnât want to draw attention to it: too much honesty could cost her three thousand pounds. Sheâd get the magnifying glass out after the client had left.
She lifted a pen. âIâll need your name and address.â
The womanâs eyes flared. âIs that necessary? Iâll be paying cash.â
âIâm sorry, it is necessary. But donât worry, I really will treat the matter with absolute confidence.â
âOh, very well. Mrsâ - she emphasised the word just slightly - âSelma Doyle, 57 River Drive, Dimmock.â
âYou wonât want me calling you,â said Brodie. âCall me here tomorrow afternoon. I should be able to tell you then if I can help.â
Â
Â
âI take it you could,â said Jack Deacon.
âOh yes,â said Brodie Farrell bitterly. âHelpful is my middle name.â
âHow? With just a bad photograph?â
âI was right,â said Brodie, âthere was something else in the picture. When I put it under a magnifying glass I could see what it was.â
Â
Â
It was a telescope. Quite a big telescope: as tall as the man, with an aperture as broad as his fist.
Brodie faxed a copy of the photograph to the Astronomical Association in London. Though it was a bad picture to start with and would be worse by the time they saw it, they might still be able to identify the subject.
And so they did. âYour photograph shows a 100-millimetre skeleton reflector of Newtonian design, apparently home-made. Suggests the owner is a serious amateur. This is about the largest telescope that would be conveniently portable: anything bigger would be on a permanent mounting.â
So the man she sought, the man who wasnât Charles Merrick, was serious about astronomy. He would be known in places where star-gazers met.
The âYearbook of Astronomyâ alerted her to three forthcoming meetings within a thirty mile radius of Dimmock. Brodie took the grainy picture along to the first, a lecture in Eastbourne that evening.
There she learned his name. Daniel Hood wasnât present but people who recognised him were. Or rather, people who recognised the telescope. Faces seemed to be just so much wallpaper to them, but a 100-mm skeleton Newtonian reflector, well, you donât see one of those every day.
âWhere would I find him?â she asked.
They werenât sure. They only ever saw him at gatherings like this. They supposed he had a home and a job somewhere, but those were
things that took place in the daylight and astronomers mostly come out at night.
Armed now with a name, she trawled the membership lists of astronomical societies across southern England until she found him. And where she found him was only quarter of a mile from where she was sitting: a flat converted from a netting loft on Dimmockâs shingle shore.
She was less than honest with the club secretary. She claimed they were cousins, sheâd promised to look him up when she moved to the area only sheâd lost his address. âWhat does he look like? Iâd hate to fling myself at the wrong Daniel Hood.â
The secretary thought for a moment. âMid twenties, small, fair. Terrible eyesight, which is a major problem to an astronomer. You need your glasses to find what you want to observe, then you take them off to use the eyepiece. But the finderscope isnât lined up, so you put them back on to adjust it. Then you take them off to look through the telescope again. And itâs dark, you see, so if you put them down you have to remember where â¦â
âOh yes,â said Brodie with certainty, âthatâs cousin Dan.â The bottle-bottom glasses had been clear even on that photograph.
A scant twenty-four hours had passed. When Mrs Doyle phoned immediately after lunch Brodie was able to pass on the