then hit me!â Nash shouted, so angry that she remained dry-eyed all night, which surprised her as a departure from her habit of crying privately through anxiety before demonstrations. She went instead to a lawyer, but the harsh realities of divorce made her hesitate. Nash remained partly under the spell of Bevel, who, always on the offensive, folded the conflict into a teaching tool for their ongoing commitment to answer the Birmingham church bombing. Citing Nash herself, ironically, he presented nonviolence as a kind of nuclear science by which truth properly applied could release stupendous healing energy in the larger society.
King knew there was calculated political strategy in Bevelâs method, beyond his mystical exuberance and personal demons, and that the real target of the proposed journey to Montgomery was not Governor Wallace but the national government in Washington. For nine years now, since the Montgomery bus boycott of 1955â56, Kingâs cohorts had experimented with the spiritual and political arts required to nurture a small inspiration, such as the arrest of Rosa Parks, into a movement of sufficient scope to make America ârise up and live out the true meaning of its creed,â as he put it in his signature âdreamâ speech. For King, this meant steering a course that took account not only of Bevelâs state of mind and the residual strength of the jailgoers in Selma, plus the likely effect of Lorenzo Harrisonâs flight into the mass meeting, but also the response from national leaders a world apart.
B Y FAR the most critical figure for him to read was President Lyndon Johnson, whose relations with King contrasted sharply with President John F. Kennedyâs sympathetic, sophisticated aloofness. Whereas Kennedy had charmed King while keeping him at a safe distance, harping in private on the political dangers of alleged subversives in the civil rights movement, Johnson in the White House was intensely personal but unpredictableâtreating King variously to a Texas bear hug of shared dreams or a towering, wounded snit. After the assassination in Dallas, Johnson had burst with urgent intimacy in a telephone call, promising to show King âhow worthy Iâm going to try to be of all of your hopes,â and the new President indeed played skillfully upon national mourning to enact the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964. Then Johnson had turned suddenly coy and insecure. Having consciously alienated the century-old segregationist base of his Democratic Party, he refused to see King, pretended he had nothing to do with his own nominating convention, and lashed out privately at both Kingâs Negroes and white Southerners. Just as suddenly, after his landslide election in November, Johnson had rushed past Kingâs congratulations to confide a crowning ambition to win the right for Negroes to vote. âThat will answer seventy percent of your problems,â he had said in January, rehearsing at breakneck speed speeches he urged on King to dramatize the idea that every American should âhave a right to vote just like he has a right to fight, and that we just extend it whether itâs a Negro or whether itâs a Mexican or who it is.â King, on his heels, had mumbled approval. He did not mention that he was headed to Selma for that very purposeâknowing that Johnson would not welcome his tactics of street protestâand the President kept pressing him to aim higher than conventional civil rights goals such as a Negro Cabinet officer. âThereâs not gonna be anything, though, doctor, as effective as all of âem votinâ,â Johnson had told King. âThatâll get you a message that all the eloquence in the world wonât bringâ¦. I think this will be bigger, because it will do things that even that â64 act couldnât do.â
More recently, Johnsonâs mood had turned prickly again. When a haggard King