gifts. Sometimes Todd would sing in the Dickinson house for Emily, who listened upstairs, composing poems on the spot. Thus Dickinson and the woman who eventually edited the first volume of her work never met face-to-face. An odder relationship in the history of American letters would be hard to fathom.
After Dickinson died in 1886,Vinnie pressured anyone possessing an ounce of literary acumen to do something about her sisterâs orphaned poems. Susan initially agreed to edit them, then backed out, claiming the poems would never sell. Vinnie turned, among others, to the same Thomas Wentworth Higginson who had assailed Walt Whitman. As Vinnie was aware, her sisterâs correspondence with Higginson began in 1862, after the appearance of a Higginson essay in The Atlantic called âLetter to a Young Contributor,â which assured that editors are âalways hungering and thirsting after novelties.â Dickinson was thirty-one when she sent along a short letter and four poems, asking Higginson, famously, if her âVerse is alive.â Although he offered Dickinson some guarded praise, Higginson said to The Atlantic âs editor, âI
foresee that âYoung Contributorsâ [sic] will send me worse things than ever now.â In the following epistolary exchanges, a strange friendship formed. In time, Higginson came to see Dickinson as a remarkable, if not publishable, talent, and despite occasional reluctance served her as a valuable friend. Although he spoke at Dickinsonâs funeral, Higginson declined Vinnieâs plea to edit her poetry.
In desperation, Vinnie approached Mabel Todd. Todd had many reasons for turning Vinnie down, her own literary ambitions among them. But she was deeply depressed with Amherst and her battles with Susan. Dickinsonâs troubled, eerie poems seemed, as she later wrote, âto open the door into a wider universe than the little sphere surrounding me.â Actually faced with transcribing the poemsâsheer illegibility and Dickinsonâs grammatical peculiarities making it immensely difficultâsoon convinced her she could not manage the job alone. She contacted Higginson herself, who told Todd that, while he admired Dickinsonâs verse, he deplored its undisciplined form. Only after listening to Todd read some poems aloud did Higginson, at long last, assent to involvement. The growing toxicity between Austin, Susan, Vinnie, and Todd complicated the editing process, as did Higginsonâs stuffy insistence on titling Dickinsonâs poems. âBecause I could not stop for Deathâ appeared in 1890âs Poems under the Higginsonian title of âThe Chariot.â
Their task completed, Higginson sent the poems to Houghton Mifflin, where they were quickly rejected as âqueer.â Humiliated, Higginson more or less bowed out from the publishing process, and after months of failure and negotiation, the firm Roberts and Brothers agreed to publish Dickinsonâs poems, requiring that Vinnie pay for the printerâs plates. After an ordeal whose vicissitudes could have derailed the project any number of times, the poems were published in 1890. Public reception was immediate. Poems would go through eleven printings within the next two years.
What, then, do we have to thank for the survival of American literatureâs three greatest figures? Remaindered copies bought from book peddlers. A man, sitting at his desk, an oxidized copy of a forgotten novel beside him, cobbling together an essay with no idea of what it would accomplish. The lovely devotion of solitary women and men. Essays published at the right time, in the right journals or books, noticed by the right people. Clearly, these are not the props of fate. They are, rather, the stagecraft of chance.
The comfort we take in these writersâ survival is undercut by some quietly nagging questions: How many novels did Carl Van Dorenâs hand pass over to find Moby-Dick ? How