entity known as the Elixir of Life (sometimes called the Philosopherâs Stone). Some believed that those who imbibed it would prolong their lives to a thousand years, others that it yielded not only perpetual youth but an increase of knowledge and wisdom.
As Jung perceived, alchemical processes were âso loaded with unconscious 19 contents that a state of participation mystique or unconscious identityâ arose between the alchemist and the substances with which he worked. The analogy, if unconscious, was nevertheless pervasive. âThe combination of two bodies 20 he saw as a marriage,â F. Sherwood Taylor observes in The Alchemists. âThe loss of their characteristic activity as death, the production of something new as a birth, the rising up of vapors, as a spirit leaving the corpse, the formation of a volatile solid, as the making of a spiritual body. These conceptions influenced his idea of what should occur, and he therefore decided that the final end of the substances operated on should be analogous to the final end of manâa new soul in a new, glorious body, with the qualities of clarity, subtlety and agility.â
Following the dictum solve et coagula (dissolve and combine), the alchemist worked to transform body into spirit and spirit into body; to volatilize that which is fixed, and to fix that which is volatile. But the âbase materialâ he worked upon and the âgoldâ he produced may also be understood as man himself, in his quest to perfect his own nature.
A repeating axiom in the literature of alchemy is: âWhat is above is as that which is below, and what is below is as that which is above.â Alchemists believed in an essential unity of the cosmos; that there is a correspondence between things physical and spiritual, and that the same laws operate in both realms. âThe Sages have been taught of God that this natural world is only an image and material copy of a heavenly and spiritual pattern,â wrote the seventeenth-century Moravian alchemist Michael Sendivogius; âthat the real existence in this world is based upon the reality of the celestial archetype; and that God had created it in imitation of the spiritual and invisible universe.â
Alchemical work, from Michelspacherâs Cabala, Augsburg, 1616
In their preoccupations, alchemists can be said to have much in common with priests (albeit heretical ones), but it is more to the point to say that the distinctions between religion, medicine, science, art, and psychology were not nearly so absolute in their time as they are now. Nor was the boundary between matter and spirit so firm. As Titus Burckhardt observes:
For the people of earlier ages 21 , what we today call matter was not the same as for people of today, either as regards the concept or the experience. This is not to say the so-called primitive peoples of the world only saw through a veil of âmagical and compulsive imaginingsâ as certain ethnologists have supposed, or that their thinking was âalogicalâ or âpre-logical.â Stones were just as hard as today, fire was just as hot, and natural laws just as inexorable â¦
According to Descartes, spirit and matter are completely separate realities, which thanks to divine ordination come together only at one point: the human brain. Thus the material world, known as âmatter,â is automatically deprived of any spiritual content, while the spirit, for its part, becomes the abstract counterpart of the same purely material reality, for what it is in itself, above and beyond this, remains unspecified.
As science and reason gained ground, alchemy went into eclipse (although some important scientists, most notably Isaac Newton,
practiced it). The practical legacy of the alchemists passed to the chemists, who put it in service of the effort to dissect and analyze the elements of the natural world. The spiritual legacy of the alchemists can be seen as