me. A shepherd has to know his principalsâ buying habitsâitâs very helpful in understanding themâand instinctively I noted Chanel, Coach and Cartier. A rich girl and probably near the top of her class at Yale or Harvard Law.
Westerfield said, âThis is Assistant U.S. Attorney Chris Teasley.â
She shook my hand and acknowledged Ellis.
âIâm just explaining the Kessler situation to them.â Then to us: âChrisâll be working with us on it.â
âLetâs hear the details,â I said, aware that Teasley was scenting the air, floral and subdued. Sheopened her attaché case with loud hardware snaps and handed her boss a file. As he skimmed it I noted a sketch on Ellisâs wall. His corner office wasnât large but it was decorated with a number of pictures, some posters from mall galleries, some personal photos and art executed by his children. I stared at a watercolor drawing of a building on a hillside, not badly rendered.
I had nothing on my office walls except lists of phone numbers.
âHereâs the sit.â Westerfield turned to Ellis and me. âI heard from the Bureauâs Charleston, West Virginia, field office this morning. Make a long story short, the state police were running a meth sting out in the boonies and they stumbled on some prints on a pay phone, turned out to be Henry Lovingâs. For some reason the homicide and surveillance warrants werenât cancelled after he died. Well, supposedly died, looks like.
âThey call our people and we take over, find out Loving flew into Charleston a week ago under some fake name and ID. Nobody knows from where. Finally, they tracked him down to a motel in Winfield this morning. But heâd already checked outâa couple of hours ago, around eight-thirty. Clerk doesnât know where he was going.â
At a nod from her boss, Teasley continued, âThe surveillance warrants are technically still active, so the agents checked out emails at the hotel. One received and one sent: the go-ahead order and Lovingâs acknowledgment.â
Ellis asked, âWhat would he be doing in West Virginia?â
I knew Loving better than anybody in the room.I said, âHe usually worked with a partner; he might be picking somebody up there. Weapons too. He wouldnât fly with them. In any case, heâll avoid the D.C.-area airports. A lot of people up here still remember what he looks like after . . . after what happened a few years ago.â I asked, âInternet address of the sender?â
âRouted through proxies. Untraceable.â
âAny phone calls to or from his room in the motel?â
âMais non.â
The French was irritating. Had Westerfield just gotten back from a package vacation or was he boning up to prosecute an Algerian terrorist?
âWhat does the order say exactly, Jason?â I asked patiently.
At a nod from him, Chris Teasley did the honors. âLike you were saying, it was solely a go-ahead. So theyâd have had prior conversations where they laid out the details.â
âGo on, please,â I said to her.
The woman read, â âLovingâRe: Kessler. Itâs a go. Need details, per our discussion, by Monday midnight, or unacceptable consequences, as explained. Once you get information, subject must be eliminated.â End of quote. It gave an address in Fairfax.â
Unacceptable consequences . . . all hell breaking loose.
âNo audio?â
âNo.â
I was disappointed. Voice analysis can tell a lot about the caller: gender, most of the time, national and regional roots, illnesses, even reasonable morphologicaldeductions can be made about the shape of the nose, mouth and throat. But at least we had a confirmed spelling of the principalâs name, which was a plus.
âKesslerâs a cop in the District. Ryan Kessler, detective,â Westerfield