and looked across at Paulâs silhouette. âHatching is a pattern of lines filling a shape. Northern groupsâones connected to Chacoâwere known for diagonal lines. So the slip and the hatching were northern, while the overall style was southern. It was odd. Why was someone making bowls with both northern and southern elements?
âStill, we werenât finding anything significant. We were thinking about packing up. But then we moved to one of the smaller blocks, at the edge of the site. When we got to the bottom, we found a small storage room. We struck a stash of stuff: six parrot effigies, none bigger than a manâs fist. Theyâd been painted in detail, although the shape of them wasnât exactly anatomically correct. Larger-than-life beaks, big eyes, short tails.â
She took a breath. âAnd we found three perfect bowlsâa complete set nesting inside each other. With the same traits as the sherds weâd found. One had a ring of parrots. Scarlet macaws. The others had parrots in the center of the bowls. On each bowl, the parrots were drawn very distinctively: Their beaks are too curved. Their wings are partially extended and diagonally hatched. Their claws are pronounced.â
âWhole bowls?â asked Paul. âI thought whole bowls were practically impossible.â
âYeah,â said Silas, slowly. âAnd she found three of them.â
âItâs one artist,â said Ren. âI know it is. The work is too idiosyncratic. The pieces are Style Three Classic Mimbres Black-on-White, dating somewhere after AD 1100. We know it all came to an end around 1150, so the artist must have lived in the first half of the twelfth century. Assuming the Mimbreños assigned the same gender roles as other Pueblo groups, the artist was a woman. So maybe this woman moved from the north to the south. Or maybe the daughter of a northern woman is copying her motherâs style. But itâs one woman. I know it. One set of hands made those bowls.â
She brushed nonexistent crumbs from her hands. She needed to stop talking. There was a temptation, always, to try and convey why this mattered, why the idea of one artist was so compelling. But she couldnât put words to it. Surely no one wanted to disappear. An archaeologist sought out those who couldnât tell their own story, and then, bit by bit, she tried to tell it for them. The Mimbreños were unusual for actually painting images of their world. They illustrated people and animals and insectsâsmall snapshots of their lives. But for all the thousands of stories they may have painted into their pottery, no one knew how to read them. The meaning was missing. No one even knew what the people called themselvesâ
mimbres
was the Spanish word for âwillow,â a label attached long after the culture had died out.
Mimbreños
, the Willow People.
But this artist was one person, one woman who would have felt the sun on her face and known the smell of her paints and laid her head on her motherâs lap when she was small. The discovery of the bowls felt to Ren like a personal plea. She could bring this woman, piece by piece, back from the dead. She could make sure she was remembered. She could save her.
âAnd now it looks like she might have been here, too,â she continued, âfifty miles from Crow Creek. Or her work was taken here.â
âOur preliminary data suggests populations were migrating from up to seventy-five miles away. Maybe further,â said Silas.
âSo why did the artist come here?â Ren asked. âOr, if she started here, why did she move there? What does it mean?â
She didnât expect an answer, and no one offered one. You assumed the dead wanted their story told, that they wanted their lives to be known and remembered and understood. You had to assume that. Only occasionally did Ren allow for the possibility that they were happy sleeping, that